Method

Thematic analysis workflow

Build, test, relate, revise, and review themes against exact supporting and counterexample evidence.

Implemented task

Public task

Open Themes and create or inspect a human-owned theme.

Expected outcome: Theme structure, relations, evidence, counterexamples, and history remain explicitly human-reviewable.

ApplicationRequires Sign-in, Existing project

Declared product contract

Inputs and task boundary

Inputs

  • A project using the thematic template
  • Reviewed codes and exact evidence

Input constraints

  • Automatic theme candidates remain suggestions until explicitly reviewed.
  • Complete thematic reporting remains a separate delivery milestone.

User actions

  1. Create or review human-owned themes.
  2. Organize members, hierarchy, evidence, counterexamples, and relations.
  3. Revise, merge, archive, or restore themes with history.

Outputs

  • A versioned human-owned theme structure with exact supporting and counterexample evidence.

Decision boundary

Where it fits

  • Researchers constructing and reviewing themes against coded evidence.

Outside the boundary

Where it does not fit

  • A complete final thematic report before M6.

Current scope

Limitations

  • Complete thematic reporting remains tracked separately in the reporting milestone.

Verification

Product proof

journey

proof.x-r01-method-template

Open artifact
Verified
Review due
Expires
  • Seven frozen method templates and their steps are visible before project creation.
  • Starter-codebook choice and framework prerequisites remain explicit.
  • The frozen method guide and recovery survive refresh.

Failure boundary: The proof covers template selection and method discipline, not every deep method workflow or report.

journey

proof.x-r02-theme-workspace

Open artifact
Verified
Review due
Expires
  • Researchers create, relate, merge, archive, and version human-owned themes.
  • Automatic reruns do not overwrite human structures and withdrawn evidence is minimized.
  • Large theme structures remain virtualized with an equivalent keyboard path.

Failure boundary: Complete thematic reporting remains an M6 deliverable.

OpenVerbatim is an open-source (Apache-2.0) qualitative data analysis platform for coding and analyzing interview transcripts. AI-suggested codes stay marked as suggestions until a human reviewer confirms or rejects them, and every decision is kept in an audit trail. The full feature set is available when self-hosted; there is no paid feature wall.